By Teresa Torres · producttalk.org · @ttorres on X · LinkedIn
Teresa Torres argues that product managers are essentially designers who solve ill-structured problems, which have no single right answer and several competing solutions. Drawing on educational psychologist David Jonassen's research, she contends that PMs often mistakenly treat these problems like well-structured ones, relying on rigid prioritization formulas. Instead, she proposes treating product work as a design process: framing the problem, exploring multiple perspectives, grounding those perspectives in evidence, and synthesizing a shared understanding before seeking solutions. The approach matters because disagreements usually stem from misaligned problem representations, and a richer problem space yields better solutions.
01Key takeaways
- Treat product challenges as ill-structured problems with several valid solutions, not as puzzles with one right answer.
- Spend more time framing the problem before jumping to solutions, since different framings produce different solutions.
- Map your own specific recent experiences first, capturing goals, motivations, thoughts, and feelings.
- Have teammates create individual maps without group conformity, and listen with curiosity rather than critique.
- Use affinity mapping on customer research data to build a shared, evidence-backed understanding of the challenge.
- Keep the problem map a living document and validate it with evaluative research before exploring solutions.
02Key sections
- Product Managers Are Problem Solvers
- Torres frames product management as a form of design, meaning problem solving rather than only aesthetics. She cites Jonassen's distinction between well-structured problems with known answers and ill-structured problems with multiple tradeoffs.
- How Not to Solve Product Problems
- She warns against applying formulaic feature-scoring spreadsheets to ill-structured business challenges. Treating messy problems as if they had fixed rules leads to false confidence in poor decisions.
- Explore the Problem Space
- Because each person represents the problem differently, teams disagree without resolution. Torres recommends mapping out multiple perspectives, starting with one's own, to expand the problem space and open more solutions.
- Map Experiences, Then Immerse in Customer Perspectives
- She describes mapping specific personal experiences, then having teammates map theirs independently, then grounding everything in real customer research. Customer observation should follow self-reflection so personal assumptions don't bias the findings.
- Synthesize, Align, and Test
- Teams use affinity mapping on raw research data to converge on a shared perspective, make it explicit as a visual map, and then validate it with evaluative research, revising it as a living document.
03From the post
“I’ve never met a product manager who doesn’t want to get better at what they do. The challenge is not in the desire, but in putting that desire into action. Product management isn’t a well-defined function. It’s changed rapidly over the past two decades. Most”
04Frameworks mentioned
Summary and takeaways written by PM Atlas; quotes are short excerpts. © the original author.