By Teresa Torres · producttalk.org · @ttorres on X · LinkedIn
Teresa Torres argues that the MVP is widely misunderstood and that getting it right is critical for product teams. Instead of letting build time drive priorities, she suggests distilling a big, ideal idea into the smallest version that still delivers real value, so the team can learn what creates value. She stresses being ruthless about cutting scope, treating cut features as 'tomorrow problems,' and staying involved as engineers build, since requirements change on contact with them. The piece also argues that product managers should help turn 'impossible' into a workable approximation and resist scope creep. For PMs, the core message is that the MVP is a learning tool balancing minimum with viable.
01Key takeaways
- Choose what to build next by impact on your goal, not by how long it takes to build.
- Distill ideas to the smallest version that still delivers the core value users need.
- Treat features you cut as tomorrow problems, not never problems, to avoid stalling progress.
- Stay closely involved as engineers build, since requirements evolve once building starts.
- Reframe 'impossible' requests into achievable approximations rather than accepting them as final.
- Resist scope creep and polish; the goal is delivering the right value quickly.
02Key sections
- Why build time shouldn't drive priorities
- Torres argues the next thing to build should be whatever most advances the goal, not whatever is quickest. An MVP lets you shrink a large idea into something testable when runway or upfront cost is a concern.
- Finding the smallest valuable version
- Identify the heart of the idea and how users get value from it, then build the smallest piece that captures that value. Smallest is not the same as easiest, and the MVP must stay viable.
- Being ruthless with scope
- Repeatedly ask how the idea could work without each element, and cut anything that is not essential. Deferred items are 'tomorrow problems,' not never problems.
- Staying involved while engineers build
- Requirements change once engineers start building, so PMs must stay engaged, help solve hard problems, and reframe the work to make the ideal achievable.
- Managing scope growth and seeking shortcuts
- Resist tempting corner cases and polish that add little value, and build a culture where less is more, focused on what users actually need.
03From the post
“The MVP. The minimum viable product. The most misunderstood concept in the world of Lean startups. And one of the most critical to get right. Why Time To Build Doesn’t Matter In this post about prioritizing, I argue that time to build shouldn’t be taken into consideration when”
04Frameworks mentioned
Summary and takeaways written by PM Atlas; quotes are short excerpts. © the original author.