Product Talk · Free post · Metrics, data & experimentation · Building AI products

Conversations with Claude: Can You Conduct a Content Audit?

Teresa TorresMar 11, 20265 min
SourceProduct Talk
KindFree post
PublishedMar 11, 2026
Originalproducttalk.org ↗
N:

Teresa Torres introduces a new series, Conversations with Claude, showing how she uses Claude Code for real work. Her first example is a content audit of Product Talk, which she delegated to Claude with a task file and keyword-research tools. Claude extracted roughly 100 keywords from her CDH book, checked search volumes and the site's rankings, and identified high-volume gaps where her content did not rank. It also suggested both content updates for ranking pages and entirely new articles. The piece matters because it shows an AI-assisted workflow for SEO and content strategy that many product writers neglect, while noting that a generic prompt alone would produce weak results.

01Key takeaways

  • Start AI-assisted audits with clarifying questions and explicit decision rules, such as what counts as ranking well.
  • Use high-volume generic terms as entry points, then frame them with your specific product perspective.
  • Prioritize gaps around your central thesis, since they often yield the biggest audience opportunity.
  • Give the model a task file and context files rather than relying on a bare prompt to get useful results.
  • Treat AI output as a starting plan to discuss and refine, not a final decision.

02Key sections

Why this series exists
Torres explains she wants to show the practical why behind Claude Code, not just setup steps. She also discloses she has no compensation from Anthropic.
Setting up the audit
Claude asked clarifying questions about keyword scope, geography, what counts as well-covered content, and output format before starting work. Torres answered with specific rules for judging rankings.
What the audit found
Claude reported strong branded rankings but large gaps on central concepts like outcomes versus outputs, product roadmaps, and story mapping. It proposed a trojan-horse strategy of writing on broad, high-volume terms with a discovery angle.
Why generic prompting falls short
Torres stresses that simply asking Claude to audit a site produces weak output, and that the quality came from the context and iteration she set up beforehand.

03From the post

“During one of our recent Claude Code Office Hours, a participant asked, "Can we zoom out? Help me understand what I can use Claude Code for." This is a great question. I was so focused on how to help people set up Claude Code that I forgot to share the”

“The trojan horse opportunity: High-volume generic terms like story mapping, pre-mortem, and usability testing could bring in readers who don't know about CDH yet.”Teresa Torres · Product Talk
“It's easy to forget that not everyone is already sold on this new way of working.”Teresa Torres · Product Talk

04Frameworks mentioned

Summary and takeaways written by PM Atlas; quotes are short excerpts. © the original author.